In 2025, Privileged Access Management (PAM) will be a key branch of cybersecurity to protect identities and privileged access within an organization. With evolving cyber-attacks and threats, two major PAM solution providers CyberArk and Beyond Trust with their unique approach will prevent security threats.
To choose between CyberArk and BeyondTrust, let us compare and analyze what is best suited for an organization.
Deployment Focus and Platform Architecture
CyberArk is primarily designed for enterprises with large and complex environments. It offers distinct modules for customized needs like PAM, Endpoint Privilege Manager, and Secrets Manager that can be deployed separately or together. This gives organizations more control but increases implementation complexities.
BeyondTrust’s deployment focus is flexible with options available for enterprises of all sizes, including mid-sized businesses. It offers a unified platform that combines all PAM capabilities, simplifying implementation and management, thus making it more accessible for different organizations with distinct needs.
Remote Access Capabilities & Worker Support
CyberArk Privileged Access Security primarily focuses on securing internal privileged accounts. Remote access for third-party vendors is available but less tightly integrated. Primarily targets enterprise IT users and privileged accounts, with less focus on remote support.
BeyondTrust excels in Vendor Privileged Access Management (VPAM), offering a more seamless and secure solution for managing third-party access. Thus, it has an edge over CyberArk here.
Extends remote support to IT teams and vendors without requiring VPN access, making it a stronger choice for modern hybrid work environments.
DevOps and Secrets Management
Both solution providers offer unique security approaches.
CyberArk has a dedicated solution (Conjur) for managing DevOps secrets and application credentials. On the other hand, BeyondTrust integrates secrets management directly into its PAM platform for DevOps security. Clearly, BeyondTrust potentially offers a more streamlined experience for DevOps teams.
Zero Trust Implementation
CyberArk and BeyondTrust offer advanced and modern forms of zero-trust security models. CyberArk focuses heavily on Zero Standing Privilege (ZSP) and temporary elevation of permissions. While BeyondTrust aligns with zero-trust models by combining Just In Time access with endpoint controls and session monitoring.
Endpoint Management and Privilege Control
When it comes to endpoint privilege management EPM, CyberArk, and BeyondTrust have strong strategies and different implementation strategies. Earlier provides powerful EPM requiring separate configuration and licensing. On the other hand, the latter offers a more tightly integrated approach, making it easier to deploy and manage across an organization.
Session Monitoring and Compliance
Both solutions offer advanced session monitoring capabilities but with different strengths. CyberArk provides advanced session isolation and monitoring with integrations into SIEM tools for real-time alerting. Meanwhile, BeyondTrust has similar monitoring but emphasizes session workflows for vendors and employees alike.
CyberArk and BeyondTrust are amongst the best PAM solution providers. They both have unique and different strategies to provide solutions to organizations from different industries.
CyberArk is best suited for a modular enterprise-focused approach for large organizations. BeyondTrust is a better option for enterprises seeking a unified and streamlined approach with significant remote access and vendor management needs.
The choice depends on the organization's specific requirements, size, and security priorities.
To Book FREE PAM Consultation visit IDMEXPRESS today!
Comments